Abandoning a minor, A276 Revised Penal Code

1. Concept

Abandoning a minor – refers to the crime of abandoning a child under seven (7) years of age, whose custody is incumbent upon the offender.

a. Legal basis

Art. 276. Abandoning a minor. – The penalty of arresto mayor and a fine not exceeding One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000) shall be imposed upon anyone who shall abandon a child under seven (7) years of age, the custody of which is incumbent upon him.
When the death of the minor shall result from such abandonment, the culprit shall be punished by prisión correccional in its medium and maximum periods; but if the life of the minor shall have been in danger only, the penalty shall be prisión correccional in its minimum and medium periods.
The provisions contained in the two (2) preceding paragraphs shall not prevent the imposition of the penalty provided for the act committed, when the same shall constitute a more serious offense. (As amended by R.A. 10951)

(Revised Penal Code)

2. Modes of commission

The following are the modes of committing the offense:

1) By abandoning a child under seven (7) years of age, whose custody is incumbent upon the offender

a. Mode 1: Abandonment of a child under 7 years old

Elements of the crime of abandoning a minor:

1) The offender abandons a child under seven (7) years of age; and

2) The custody of which is incumbent upon him. (REVISED PENAL CODE, Article 276)

Element 1: Abandoning a child under 7 years old

For the 1st element, the offender abandons a child under seven (7) years of age.

The age of the child is critical to note for this offense. The child has to be under seven (7) years of age (6 years old, 5 years old, etc.) and thus exclude a 7-year-old child.

The fact of abandonment may be done in various ways, such as leaving the child in  a house and never returning, taking the child to a public place and leaving, or leaving the child in the front steps of a church or a home.

Element 2: Custody on offender

For the 2nd element, the custody of the child must have been incumbent upon the offender.

That the offender was entrusted custody of the child is an important qualification. That custody may be given in several ways, such as being given the child for temporary safekeeping by the latter’s parents or being appointed as guardian by a court.

3. Things to note

The following are some additional things to note about this offense.

a. More serious offense

[Articles 275 and 276] shall not prevent the imposition of the penalty provided for the act committed, when the same shall constitute a more serious offense. (REVISED PENAL CODE, Paragraph 3, Article 276)

This may include reckless imprudence resulting in homicide.

4. Distinguish from other offenses

N/A

5. In relation to other offenses

N/A

6. Complex crime

N/A

7. Special complex crime

N/A

8. Procedural

N/A

References

Title IX – Crimes Against Personal Liberty and Security, Act No. 3815, Revised Penal Code, as amended

/Updated: August 21, 2023

Content Details

Disclaimer: All information is for educational and general information only. These should not be taken as professional legal advice or opinion. Please consult a competent lawyer to address your specific concerns. Any statements or opinions of the author are solely his own and do not reflect that of any organization he may be connected. Please refer to our full Disclaimer.

For updates: If the legal provisions being discussed have been amended or repealed by legislation or has been the subject of a Supreme Court decision which may have impacted how it is interpreted, do let us know so we can consider for the next update. Reach out via our Contact Us

Related Content

Dwelling, A14(3) Revised Penal Code

1. Concept Dwelling, as an aggravating circumstance under the Revised Penal Code – refers to the circumstance when the offender commits the crime in the

Videos & Podcasts

Legal Maxims

dura lex, sed lex

Latin maxim. • “The law is hard, but that is the law.” (Dela Cruz v. CA, G.R. Nos. 120652, 11 February 1998)

nullum crimen, nulla poena sige lege

Latin maxim. • “that there can exist no punishable act except those previously and specifically provided for by penal statute” (Corpuz v. People, En Banc,

ex dolo malo non oritur actio

Latin maxim. • “The law will not aid either party to an illegal agreement; it leaves the parties where it finds them.” (Bough v. Cantiveros,

legis non est recedendum

Latin maxim. • “from the words of a statute there should be no departure” (Bolos v. Bolos, G.R. No. 186400, October 20, 2010)

See more

Law Content