Law Dictionary

Question A.9, Civil Law, 2019 Bar Exam

Notice: The following suggested answers simulate those that a bar examinee may provide as an answer to a bar exam question. Thus, specific citations (i.e., republic acts, articles/sections, jurisprudence, etc.) are not provided because it is not required in the bar exam. For purposes other than answering the bar exam, please be reminded that proper referencing or legal citation is required.

Question A.9, Civil Law, 2019 Bar Exam

Ms. U is a usufructuary of a piece of land owned by Mr. L. During the existence of the usufruct, Ms. U introduced various useful improvements on the land. Upon termination of the usufruct, Mr. L requested Ms. U to remove the said improvements, but Ms. U refused, demanding instead that Mr. L reimburse her the value of the same.

(a) What is a usufruct? (2%)

(b) Is Ms. U’s demand proper? Explain. (3%)

Suggested Answer:

(a) Usufruct gives a right to enjoy the property of another with the obligation of preserving its form and substance, unless the title constituting it or the law otherwise provides.

(b) No. Answer

Under the Civil Code, there is no right granted to a usufructuary to demand reimbursement for any improvements made. Nor is there any obligation on the landowner to reimburse for any improvements made by the usufructuary. Notwithstanding, applying the principle of unjust enrichment, Mr. P may be compelled to pay for the improvements; otherwise, Ms. U may have the right to remove them at her expense. Rule

In the case at bar, Ms. U does not have the right to demand reimbursement. Neither does Mr. P have the obligation to pay for the improvement unless he chooses to appropriate it.  Apply

Thus, Ms. U’s demand is not proper. Conclusion

Disclaimer: All information is for educational and general information only. These should not be taken as professional legal advice or opinion. Please consult a competent lawyer to address your specific concerns. Any statements or opinions of the author are solely his own and do not reflect that of any organization he may be connected.

Suggested Answers

Top Read

Video Lessons

Legal Maxims

nullum crimen, nulla poena sige lege

Latin maxim. • “that there can exist no punishable act except those previously and specifically provided for by penal statute” (Corpuz v. People, En Banc,

par in parem non lizabet imperium

Latin maxim. • “[a]ll states are sovereign equals and cannot assert jurisdiction over one another.” (Arigo v. Swift, En Banc, G.R. No. 206510, September 16,

el deudor de mi deudor es deudor mio

Spanish maxim. • “The debtor’s debtor is my debtor.” (Google Translate; See Gold Star Mining Co., Inc. v. Lim-Jimena, En Banc, G.R. No. L-25301, October

Read more

Annotations

You cannot copy content of this page