Law Dictionary

Question B.11, Civil Law, 2019 Bar Exam

Notice: The following suggested answers simulate those that a bar examinee may provide as an answer to a bar exam question. Thus, specific citations (i.e., republic acts, articles/sections, jurisprudence, etc.) are not provided because it is not required in the bar exam. For purposes other than answering the bar exam, please be reminded that proper referencing or legal citation is required.

Question B.11, Civil Law, 2019 Bar Exam

Mr. R is the registered owner of a parcel of land located in Cebu City covered by Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) No. 1234 issued in 1955. Since his acquisition of the lot, Mr. R and his family had been in continuous, open, and peaceful possession thereof. Mr. R died in 1980, resulting in the land being transferred in the names of his heirs, i.e., A, B, and C, who became registered owners thereof as per TCT No. 5678. During the entire time, said land had never been encumbered or disposed, and that its possession always remained with them.

Sometime in 1999, A, B, and C wanted to build a concrete fence around the parcel of land, but they were opposed by Mrs. X, who started claiming ownership over the same property on the strength of a Deed of Absolute Sale purportedly entered into by her with Mr. R during the time that he was still alive. Aggrieved, A, B, and C intend to file a complaint for quieting of title against Mrs. X.

(a) What are the substantive requisites for the action to prosper? Do they obtain in this case? Explain. (3%)

(b) Within what period should A, B, and C file the complaint for quieting of title? Explain. (2%)

(c) Assuming that B and Care residing abroad, may A, without the knowledge of B and C, file the complaint for quieting of title on behalf of all the heirs? Explain. (2%)

Suggested Answer:

(a) First question:

The substantive requisites are:

1) The plaintiff or complainant has a legal or an equitable title to or interest in the real property subject of the action; and

2) The deed, claim, encumbrance or proceeding claimed to be casting cloud on his title must be shown to be in fact invalid or inoperative despite its prima facie appearance of validity or legal efficacy.

Second question:


In the case at bar, both requisites are present. The plaintiffs (A, B, and C) have legal title to the real property by virtue of succession and/or inheritance. On the other hand, the Deed of Absolute Sale of Mrs. X is casting cloud on the title.

Thus, the requisites obtain in this case.

(b) An action to quiet title is a real action over immovables, which prescribes after thirty (30) years.

(c) Yes. Answer

Under jurisprudence, co-owner may initiate a complaint for quieting of title brought on behalf of the co-owners as it is presumed to have been filed to benefit his co-owners.  Rule

In the case at bar, as a co-owner, A may initiate a complaint for quieting of title without the knowledge of B and C. The suit will be presumed to have been filed to benefit the other co-owners, B and C. Apply

Thus, A may file the complaint for quieting of title on behalf of all the heirs and even without the knowledge of B and C. Conclusion

Disclaimer: All information is for educational and general information only. These should not be taken as professional legal advice or opinion. Please consult a competent lawyer to address your specific concerns. Any statements or opinions of the author are solely his own and do not reflect that of any organization he may be connected.

Suggested Answers

Question XI, Labor Law, 2017 Bar Exam

The modes of determining the exclusive bargaining agent of the employees in a business are: (a) voluntary recognition; (b) certification election; and (c) consent election.

Top Read

Question XII, Political Law, 2017 Bar Exam

The Congress establishes by law Philippine Funds, Inc., a private corporation, to receive foreign donations coming from abroad during national and local calamities and disasters,

Unlawful arrest, Revised Penal Code

1. Concept and legal basis Art. 269. Unlawful arrest. – The penalty of arresto mayor and a fine not exceeding One hundred thousand pesos (₱100,000)

Video Lessons

Legal Maxims

salus populi est suprema lex

Latin maxim. • “the welfare of the people is the supreme law” (Southern Luzon Drug Corporation v. DSWD, En Banc, G.R. No. 199669, April 25,

suum jus summa injuria

Latin maxim. • “the abuse of a right is the greatest possible wrong” (Gonzales v. Philippine Commercial Bank and International Bank, G.R. No. 180257, February

noscitur a sociis

Latin maxim. • “where a particular word or phrase is ambiguous in itself or is equally susceptible of various meanings, its correct construction may be

Read more


Qualified Rape, Revised Penal Code

1. Concept and legal basis Article 266-B. Penalty. – Rape under paragraph 1 of the next preceding article shall be punished by reclusion perpetua. x

You cannot copy content of this page