Law Dictionary

Question IV, Labor Law, 2017 Bar Exam

Notice: The following suggested answers simulate those that a bar examinee may provide as an answer to a bar exam question. Thus, specific citations (i.e., republic acts, articles/sections, jurisprudence, etc.) are not provided because it is not required in the bar exam. For purposes other than answering the bar exam, please be reminded that proper referencing or legal citation is required.

Question IV, Labor Law, 2017 Bar Exam

The Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Board (RTWPB) for Region 3 issued a wage order on November 2, 2017 fixing the minimum wages for all industries throughout Region 3.

(a) Is the wage order subject to the approval of the National Wages and Productivity Commission before it takes effect? (2%)

(b) The law mandates that no petition for wage increase shall be entertained within a period of 12 months from the effectivity of the wage order. Under what circumstances may the Kilusang Walang Takot, a federation of labor organizations that publicly and openly assails the wage order as blatantly unjust, initiate the review of the wage increases under the wage order without waiting for the end of the 12-month period? Explain your answer. (3%)

Suggested Answer:

(a) No. Under the Labor Code, the Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Board (RTWPB) has the authority and power to issue wage orders and such are not subject to approval of the National Wages and Productivity Commission (NWPC). Once the wage order is published, it takes effect after 15 days without any other condition.

(b) The 12-month period is subject to the exception of when there is a supervening condition, such as an extraordinary increase in prices of petroleum products and basic goods and services. In such a circumstance, the federation may file a petition for review.

Disclaimer: All information is for educational and general information only. These should not be taken as professional legal advice or opinion. Please consult a competent lawyer to address your specific concerns. Any statements or opinions of the author are solely his own and do not reflect that of any organization he may be connected.

Suggested Answers

Question XII, Labor Law, 2017 Bar Exam

Juanito initiated a case for illegal dismissal against Mandarin Company. The Labor Arbiter decided in his favor, and ordered his immediate reinstatement with full backwages

Question X, Political Law, 2018 Bar Exam

Ascertain the constitutionality of the following acts: (2.5% each) (a) An investigation conducted by the Ombudsman against a Commissioner of the Commission on Audit for

Question A.1, Labor Law, 2019 Bar Exam

Define, explain or distinguish the following terms: (a) Just and authorized causes (2%) (b) Seasonal and project employees (2%) (c) Strikes and lockouts (2%) (d)

Top Read

Expulsion, Revised Penal Code

1. Concept Article 127. Expulsion. – The penalty of prision correccional shall be imposed upon any public officer or employee who, not being thereunto authorized

Anti-Highway Robbery Law of 1974

1. Concept and legal basis a. Legal basis Presidential Decree No. 532 is known as the Anti-Piracy and Anti-Highway Robbery Law of 1974. “Philippine Waters”

Video Lessons

Legal Maxims

summun jus, summa injuria

Latin maxim. • “circumstances alter cases” (Sanchez v. CA, G.R. No. 96306, August 20 1993 [Per J. Romero, Concurring Opinion])

Read more


You cannot copy content of this page