Law Dictionary

Question VII, Labor Law, 2017 Bar Exam

Notice: The following suggested answers simulate those that a bar examinee may provide as an answer to a bar exam question. Thus, specific citations (i.e., republic acts, articles/sections, jurisprudence, etc.) are not provided because it is not required in the bar exam. For purposes other than answering the bar exam, please be reminded that proper referencing or legal citation is required.

Question VII, Labor Law, 2017 Bar Exam

Dr. Crisostomo entered into a retainer agreement with AB Hotel and Resort whereby he would provide medical services to the guests and employees of AB Hoteland Resort, which, in turn, would provide the clinic premises and medical supplies. He received a monthly retainer fee of ₱60,000.00, plus a 70% share in the service charges from AB Hotel and Resort’s guests availing themselves of the clinic’s services. The clinic employed nurses and allied staff, whose salaries, SSS contributions and other benefits he undertook to pay. AB Hotel and Resort issued directives giving instructions to him on the replenishment of emergency kits and forbidding the clinic staff from receiving cash payments from the guests.

In time, the nurses and the clinic staff claimed entitlement to rights as regular employees of AB Hoteland Resort, but the latter refused on the ground that Dr. Crisostomo, who was their employer, was an independent contractor. Rule, with reasons. (4%)

Suggested Answer:

The nurses and the clinic staff are employees of Dr. Crisostomo. Answer

Under labor law jurisprudence, the four-fold test is used to ascertain the existence of an employer-employee relationship, using these factors: (1) the selection and engagement of the employee; (2) the payment of wages; (3) the power of dismissal; and (4) the power to control the employee’s conduct, or the so-called “control test.” Of these four, the last one is the most important. Rule

In the case at bar, the nurses and the clinic staff were selected and engaged by Dr. Crisostomo. Their salaries and SSS contributions were being paid by Dr. Crisostomo. As the one who hired them, Dr. Crisostomo has the power to dismiss them. More importantly, Dr. Crisostomo exercised control over them in the performance of their work. Apply

Thus, it was incorrect for the clinic and staff to claim that they were regular employees of AB Hotel and Resort. Conclusion

Disclaimer: All information is for educational and general information only. These should not be taken as professional legal advice or opinion. Please consult a competent lawyer to address your specific concerns. Any statements or opinions of the author are solely his own and do not reflect that of any organization he may be connected.

Suggested Answers

Question X, Labor Law, 2017 Bar Exam

A. The labor sector has been loudly agitating for the end of labor-only contracting, as distinguished from job contracting. Explain these two kinds of labor

Question A.1, Labor Law, 2019 Bar Exam

Define, explain or distinguish the following terms: (a) Just and authorized causes (2%) (b) Seasonal and project employees (2%) (c) Strikes and lockouts (2%) (d)

Top Read

Question IX, Labor Law, 2017 Bar Exam

Section 255 (245) of the Labor Code recognizes three categories of employees, namely: managerial, supervisory, and rank-and-file. (a) Give the characteristics of each category of

Video Lessons

Legal Maxims

par in parem non habet imperium

Latin maxim. • “one State is not subject to the jurisdiction of another State.” (Arigo v. Swift, En Banc, G.R. No. 206510, September 16, 2014

Read more


Sedition, Revised Penal Code

1. Concept Article 139. Sedition; How committed. – The crime of sedition is committed by persons who rise publicly and tumultuously in order to attain

You cannot copy content of this page