Law Dictionary

Question XII, Civil Law, 2017 Bar Exam

Notice: The following suggested answers simulate those that a bar examinee may provide as an answer to a bar exam question. Thus, specific citations (i.e., republic acts, articles/sections, jurisprudence, etc.) are not provided because it is not required in the bar exam. For purposes other than answering the bar exam, please be reminded that proper referencing or legal citation is required.

Question XII, Civil Law, 2017 Bar Exam

Krystal owns a parcel of land covered by TCT No. 12345 in Angeles City. Due to severe financial constraints, Krystal was forced to sell the property to RBP Corporation, a foreign corporation based in South Korea. Subsequently, RBP Corporation sold the property to Gloria, one of its most valued clients.

Wanting her property back, Krystal, learning of the transfer of the property from RBP Corporation to Gloria, sued both of them in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) for annulment of sale and for reconveyance. She alleged that the sale by RBP Corporation to Gloria was void because RBP Corporation was a foreign corporation prohibited by the Constitution from acquiring and owning lands in the Philippines.

Will Krystal’s suit for annulment of sale and reconveyance prosper? Explain your answer. (4%)

Suggested Answer:

No. Answer

Under jurisprudence, if land is invalidly transferred to an alien who subsequently becomes a citizen or transfers it to a citizen, the flaw in the original transaction is considered cured and the title of the transferee is rendered valid. Rule

In the case at bar, the foreign company, RBP Corporation, subsequently sold the property to Gloria, who is presumably a Filipino citizen. This subsequent sale cured the invalidity of the sale between Krystal and RBP Corporation. Apply

Thus, Krystal’s suit for annulment of sale and reconveyance will not prosper. Conclusion

Disclaimer: All information is for educational and general information only. These should not be taken as professional legal advice or opinion. Please consult a competent lawyer to address your specific concerns. Any statements or opinions of the author are solely his own and do not reflect that of any organization he may be connected.

Suggested Answers

Question I, Labor Law, 2017 Bar Exam

What are the accepted tests to determine the existence of an employer-employee relationship? (5%) B. Applying the tests to determine the existence of an employer-employee

Top Read

Video Lessons

Legal Maxims

suum jus summa injuria

Latin maxim. • “the abuse of a right is the greatest possible wrong” (Gonzales v. Philippine Commercial Bank and International Bank, G.R. No. 180257, February

el deudor de mi deudor es deudor mio

Spanish maxim. • “The debtor’s debtor is my debtor.” (Google Translate; See Gold Star Mining Co., Inc. v. Lim-Jimena, En Banc, G.R. No. L-25301, October

Read more

Annotations

Qualified Rape, Revised Penal Code

1. Concept and legal basis Article 266-B. Penalty. – Rape under paragraph 1 of the next preceding article shall be punished by reclusion perpetua. x

Bouncing Checks Law

“Credit” – refers to an arrangement or understanding with the bank for the payment of such check. (Section 4, B.P. 22) 1. Crime a. Bouncing

Homicide, Revised Penal Code

1. Concept and legal basis Article 249. Homicide. – Any person who, not falling within the provisions of Article 246, shall kill another without the

You cannot copy content of this page