Law Dictionary

Question XVI, Civil Law, 2018 Bar Exam

Notice: The following suggested answers simulate those that a bar examinee may provide as an answer to a bar exam question. Thus, specific citations (i.e., republic acts, articles/sections, jurisprudence, etc.) are not provided because it is not required in the bar exam. For purposes other than answering the bar exam, please be reminded that proper referencing or legal citation is required.

Question XVI, Civil Law, 2018 Bar Exam

Selena was a single 18-year old when she got pregnant and gave birth to Suri. She then left to work as a caregiver in Canada, leaving Suri with her parents in the Philippines. Selena, now 34 years old and a permanent resident in Canada, met and married Sam who is a 24-year old Canadian citizen who works as a movie star in Canada. Sam’s parents are of Filipino ancestry but had become Canadian citizens before Sam was born. Wanting Suri to have all the advantages of a legitimate child, Selena and Sam decided to adopt her. Sam’s parents, already opposed to the marriage of their son to someone significantly older, vehemently objected to the adoption. They argued that Sam was not old enough and that the requisite age gap required by the Inter-Country Adoption Act between Sam as adopter and Suri as adoptee was not met.

Are Sam’s parents correct? (2.5%)

Suggested Answer:

No. Answer

Under the law on Inter-Country Adoption, the age requirement of at least twenty-seven (27) years of age and at least sixteen (16) years older than the child to be adopted, at the time of application, does not apply if adopter is the parent by nature of the child to be adopted or the spouse of such parent. Rule

In the case at bar, Sam is the spouse of Selene, who was parent of the child to be adopted, Suri. Accordingly, the age requirements do not apply to Sam Apply

Thus, Sam’s parents are not correct. Conclusion

Disclaimer: All information is for educational and general information only. These should not be taken as professional legal advice or opinion. Please consult a competent lawyer to address your specific concerns. Any statements or opinions of the author are solely his own and do not reflect that of any organization he may be connected.

Suggested Answers

Top Read

Infanticide, Revised Penal Code

1. Concept and legal basis Article 255. Infanticide. – The penalty provided for parricide in Article 246 and for murder in Article 248 shall be

Video Lessons

Legal Maxims

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus

• “false in one thing, false in everything” (Frondarina v. Malazarte, G.R. No. 148423, December 6, 2006) NB: 1) Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus

Read more

Annotations

You cannot copy content of this page