Law Dictionary

Question XVII, Political Law, 2018 Bar Exam

Notice: The following suggested answers simulate those that a bar examinee may provide as an answer to a bar exam question. Thus, specific citations (i.e., republic acts, articles/sections, jurisprudence, etc.) are not provided because it is not required in the bar exam. For purposes other than answering the bar exam, please be reminded that proper referencing or legal citation is required.

Question XVII, Political Law, 2018 Bar Exam

The police served a warrant of arrest on Ariston who was suspected of raping and killing a female high school student. While on the way to the police station, one of the police officers who served the warrant asked Ariston in the local dialect if he really raped and killed the student, and Ariston nodded and said, “Opo.” Upon arriving at the police station, Ariston saw the City Mayor, whom he approached and asked if they could talk privately. The Mayor led Ariston to his office and, while there in conversation with the Mayor, Ariston broke down and admitted that he raped and killed the student. The Mayor thereafter opened the door of the room to let the public and media representatives witness Ariston’s confession. In the presence of the Mayor, the police and the media, and in response to questions asked by some members of the media, Ariston sorrowfully confessed his guilt and sought forgiveness for his actions.

Which of these extrajudicial confessions, if any, would you consider as admissible in evidence against Ariston? (5%)

Suggested Answer:

1) The extrajudicial confession with police officers is not admissible. Answer

Under the 1987 Constitution and jurisprudence, a person under custodial investigation should be read his Miranda rights, including the right to remain silent and to counsel. Further, any extrajudicial confession should be with the assistance of counsel and in writing. Rule

In the case at bar, the admission to the police officers were defective as it did not comply with any of the requirements mentioned. Apply

Thus, the extrajudicial confession with the police officers is not admissible in evidence. Conclusion

2) The extrajudicial confession before the Mayor and the media are admissible. Answer

Under jurisprudence, confession to a Mayor by a suspect who asked for a private conversation and thereafter admitted to the commission of the crime is admissible. In such a case, it is the suspect himself who spontaneously, freely and voluntarily sought the mayor for a private meeting. The mayor does not know that the suspect was going to confess his guilt to him. When the suspect talked with the mayor as a confidant and not as a law enforcement officer, his uncounselled confession to him did not violate his constitutional rights. Rule

Further, statements spontaneously made by a suspect to news reporters on a televised interview are deemed voluntary and are admissible in evidence. Rule

In the case at bar, the suspect made a valid extrajudicial confession before the Mayor as the suspect was did so privately to the Mayor as a confidant and not a law enforcer. As for the media, the accused admitted to the offense voluntarily. Apply

Thus, the extrajudicial confession before the Mayor and media are admissible in evidence. Conclusion

Disclaimer: All information is for educational and general information only. These should not be taken as professional legal advice or opinion. Please consult a competent lawyer to address your specific concerns. Any statements or opinions of the author are solely his own and do not reflect that of any organization he may be connected.

Suggested Answers

Question V, Civil Law, 2017 Bar Exam

Jacob has owned a farm land in Ramos, Tarlac. In 2012, Liz surreptitiously entered and cultivated the property. In 2014, Jacob discovered Liz’s presence in

Top Read

Question I, Labor Law, 2017 Bar Exam

What are the accepted tests to determine the existence of an employer-employee relationship? (5%) B. Applying the tests to determine the existence of an employer-employee

Video Lessons

Legal Maxims

stare decisis et non quieta movere

Latin maxim. • “to adhere to precedents and not to unsettle things which are established” (Lazatin v. Desierto, G.R. No. 147097, June 5, 2009)

suggestio falsi est suppressio

Latin maxim. • “suggestion of falsity is suppression” (Google Translate; See Firestone Filipinas Employees Association v. Firestone Rubber and Rubber Company of the Philippines, G.R.

Read more


Swindling by Syndicate

1. Crime Swindling by a syndicate: Swindling (estafa) by syndicate is committed by a syndicate consisting of five or more persons formed with the intention

You cannot copy content of this page