Similar Posts
Subsisting and altering trade-mark, trade-names, or service marks, Revised Penal Code
1. Concept Article 188. Subsisting and altering trade-mark, trade-names, or service marks. – The penalty of prision correccional in its minimum period or a fine ranging from 50 to 2,000 pesos, or both, shall be imposed upon:1. Any person who shall substitute the trade name or trade-mark of some other manufacturer or dealer or a…
Accident, A12(4) Revised Penal Code
Accident – refers to the exempting circumstance that exempts an accused from criminal liability for committing an offense while performing a lawful act with due care, causes an injury by mere accident without fault or intention of causing it. 1. Concept Accident – refers to the exempting circumstance that exempts an accused from criminal liability…
Occupation of real property or usurpation of real rights, A312 Revised Penal Code
Occupation or usurpation of real property/rights –refers to the offense of unlawfully taking possession of any real property or usurping any real rights belonging to another person, by eans of violence against or intimidation of persons. 1. Concept Occupation or usurpation of real property/rights –refers to the offense of unlawfully taking possession of any real…
Inciting to sedition, Revised Penal Code
1. Concept Art. 142. Inciting to sedition. – The penally of prisión correccional in its maximum period and a fine not exceeding Four hundred thousand pesos (₱400,000) shall be imposed upon any person who, without taking any direct part in the crime of sedition, should incite others to the accomplishment of any of the acts…
Offering false testimony in evidence, Revised Penal Code
1. Concept Article 184. Offering false testimony in evidence. – Any person who shall knowingly offer in evidence a false witness or testimony in any judicial or official proceeding, shall be punished as guilty of false testimony and shall suffer the respective penalties provided in this section. (Article 184, Act No. 3815, Revised Penal Code)…
Question XII, Labor Law, 2017 Bar Exam
Juanito initiated a case for illegal dismissal against Mandarin Company. The Labor Arbiter decided in his favor, and ordered his immediate reinstatement with full backwages and without loss of seniority and other benefits. Mandarin Company did not like to allow him back in its premises to prevent him from influencing his co-workers to move against…