Mutiny, Revised Penal Code

1. Concept

Article 122. Piracy in general and mutiny on the high seas. – The penalty of reclusion temporal shall be inflicted upon any person who, on the high seas, shall attack or seize a vessel or, not being a member of its complement nor a passenger, shall seize the whole or part of the cargo of said vessel, its equipment, or personal belongings of its complement or passengers.
The same penalty shall be inflicted in case of mutiny on the high seas or in Philippine waters. (Act No. 3815, Revised Penal Code)

2. Mode of commission

Elements:

1) The offender is a member of ship’s complement or a passenger; and,

2) The offender commits mutiny. (Paragraph 2, Article 122, Act No. 3815, Revised Penal Code)

pardon, commutation of sentence or any other reason. (Article 113, Ibid.)

References

⦁ Book II, Act No. 3815, Revised Penal Code

Content Details

Disclaimer: All information is for educational and general information only. These should not be taken as professional legal advice or opinion. Please consult a competent lawyer to address your specific concerns. Any statements or opinions of the author are solely his own and do not reflect that of any organization he may be connected. Please refer to our full Disclaimer.

For updates: If the legal provisions being discussed have been amended or repealed by legislation or has been the subject of a Supreme Court decision which may have impacted how it is interpreted, do let us know so we can consider for the next update. Reach out via our Contact Us

Related Content

Videos & Podcasts

Legal Maxims

verba legis non est recedendum

Latin maxim. • “from the words of a statute there should be no departure” (Chavez v. JBC, En Banc, G.R. No. 202242, July 17, 2012)

de minimis non curat lex

Latin maxim. • “the law does not take account of trifles” OxfordReference.com •  “the law does not govern trifles” Merriam-Webster.com

el deudor de mi deudor es deudor mio

Spanish maxim. • “The debtor’s debtor is my debtor.” (Google Translate; See Gold Star Mining Co., Inc. v. Lim-Jimena, En Banc, G.R. No. L-25301, October

nemo dat quod non habet

Latin maxim. • “Nobody can give what he does not possess.” (Heirs of Hermosilla v. Sps. Remoquillo, G.R. No. 167320, January 30, 2007) • “one

See more

Law Content