Question XIV, Political Law, 2017 Bar Exam

To fulfill a campaign promise to the poor folk in a far-flung area in Mindanao, the President requested his friend, Pastor Roy, to devote his ministry to them. The President would pay Pastor Roy a monthly stipend of ₱50,000.00 from his discretionary fund, and would also erect a modest house of worship in the locality in an area of the latter's choice.

Does the President thereby violate any provisions of the Constitution? Explain your answer. (3%)

Suggested Answer:

Yes.  Answer

Under the 1987 Constitution, no public money or property shall be appropriated, applied, paid, or employed, directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or support of any sect, church, denomination, sectarian institution, or system of religion, or of any priest, preacher, minister, or other religious teacher, or dignitary as such, except when such priest, preacher, minister, or dignitary is assigned to the armed forces, or to any penal institution, or government orphanage or leprosarium. Rule

In the case at bar, the President used public funds from his discretionary funds to support the ministry of Pastor Roy via the monthly stipend and construction of a modest house of worship. Apply

Thus, the President violated the Constitutional prohibition against using public funds for the use, benefit, or support of a religion. Conclusion


Already a subscriber? Log in below. Not yet a member? Subscribe.


Similar Posts