| |

Legal Separation, A56 Family Code

1. Concept

Legal separation

• … refers to the state or condition wherein legally married couples choose to live physically separate lives and forego cohabitation.

• … is nothing more than the bed-and-board separation of the spouses (there being no absolute divorce in this jurisdiction). (Sy v. Eufemio, En Banc, G.R. No. L-30977, 31 January 1972, Per Reyes, J.B.L., J.)

a. Status: Legally Married

While living separately, couples who are legally separated are still legally married. To be clear, under the eyes of the law, they are still husband and wife for all intents and purposes.

1) Liabilities

1) As legally separated couples are still considered legally married, they may open themselves to certain liabilities if they engage in romantic/sexual relationships. For instance, legally separated couples may be charged with the offense of adultery, concubinage, and other related offenses.

3. Grounds for Legal Separation

To be legally separated, a married couple must initiate a legal action for legal separation before a regular court. The grounds for legal separation are as follows:

Grounds for Legal Separation1) Repeated physical violence or grossly abusive conduct
2) Physical violence or moral pressure to change religious or political affiliation
3) Attempt to corrupt or induce to engage in prostitution or connivance
4) Final judgment with more than 6 years of imprisonment
5) Drug addition or habitual alcoholism
6) Lesbianism or homosexuality
7) Contracting of a subsequent bigamous marriage
8) Sexual infidelity or perversion
9) Attempt against the life of the petitioner
10) Abandonment without justifiable cause for more than 1 year

NB: Click on any of the above grounds for more information.

4. Grounds for denial of legal separation

Grounds for Denial of Petition for Legal Separation1) Condonation
2) Consent
3) Connivance
4) In pari delicto
5) Collusion
6) Prescription

NB: Click on any of the above grounds for more information.

5. Procedure

Related: Procedure for Legal Separation, A58-62 Family Code

6. Effects of Decree of Legal Separation

Related: Effects of Decree of Legal Separation, A63-64 Family Code

7. Reconciliation

Related: Reconciliation, A65 Family Code

8. Distinguished from Other Arrangements

Legal separation should be distinguished from other arrangements as described below.

a. Legal Separation vs De Facto Separation

FactorsLegal SeparationDe Facto Separation
Legal StatusLegally MarriedLegally Married
Property RegimeDissolvedNo change

De facto separation – refers to the state or condition wherein a legally married couple are choosing to live separately but has not undergone any court action to obtain a judicial decree of legal separation.

In legal separation, the couple are still legally married under the law even after obtaining a Judicial Decree of Legal Separation. As for their property regime, it is dissolved.

On the other hand, in a de facto separation, the couple is also considered legally married. However, their property regime remains unchanged.

b. Legal Separation vs Nullity of Marriage

FactorsLegal SeparationNullity of Marriage
Legal StatusLegally MarriedNever married (from the beginning)
Property RegimeDepends on Judicial Declaration of Legal SeparationDissolved

Nullity of marriage – refers to the judicial declaration of a void marriage.

In a nullity of marriage, after securing a judicial declaration of nullity of marriage, it is as if the couples were never married since their marriage is void ab initio (from the beginning). Their property regime is likewise dissolved.

c. Legal Separation vs Annulment of Marriage

FactorsLegal SeparationAnnulment of Marriage
Legal StatusLegally MarriedMarriage is dissolved
Property RegimeDepends on Judicial Declaration of Legal SeparationDissolved

Annulment of marriage – refers to the judicial dissolution of a voidable marriage.

In annulment of marriage, after securing a judicial decree of annulment of marriage, their marriage is dissolved, i.e., they were previously married but are no longer. Further, their property regime is likewise dissolved.

d. Legal Separation vs Absolute Divorce

FactorsLegal SeparationAbsolute Divorce
Legal StatusLegally MarriedNo absolute divorce in the Philippines
Property RegimeDepends on Judicial Declaration of Legal SeparationN/A

1) The Civil Code of the Philippines… does not admit absolute divorce, quo ad vinculo matrimonii; and in fact does not even use that term, to further emphasize its restrictive policy on the matter, in contrast to the preceding legislation that admitted absolute divorce on grounds of adultery of the wife or concubinage of the husband (Act 2710). Instead of divorce, the present Civil Code only provides for legal separation (Title IV, Book 1, Arts. 97 to 108), and, even in that case, it expressly prescribes that “the marriage bonds shall not be severed” (Art. 106, subpar. 1). (Tenchavez v. Escaño, En Banc, G.R. No. L-19671, 29 November 1965, Per Reyes, J.B.L., J.; NB: Although the case cites Civil Code provisions, it is submitted that the rationale applies as well to the Family Code equivalent provisions.)

1) Exception: Code of Muslim Personal Laws of the Philippines

P.D. 1083, Code of Muslim Personal Laws of the Philippines:

Article 34. Mutual rights and obligations.
x x x
(3) The husband and the wife shall inherit from each other in accordance with this Code.

Related: See Chapter Three – Divorce (Talaq), Title II, P.D. 1083

e. Legal Separation vs Psychological Incapacity

FactorsLegal SeparationPsychological Incapacity
Legal StatusLegally MarriedVoid Marriage
Property RegimeDepends on Judicial Declaration of Legal SeparationDepends on Judicial Declaration of Nullity of Marriage

1) The existence of grounds for legal separation does not foreclose the possibility of psychological incapacity. (Yokogawa-Tan v. Republic, G.R. No. 254646, 23 October 2023, Per Leonen, SAJ.)

2) Article 36 is not to be equated with legal separation in which the grounds need not be rooted in psychological incapacity but on physical violence, moral pressure, civil interdiction, drug addiction, habitual alcoholism, sexual infidelity, abandonment and the like. (Dedel v. CA, G.R. No. 151867, 29 January 2004, Per Ynares-Santiago, J.)